After a lapse in writing (due to my failure to roll my own blogging engine in my spare time) I’ve given in and started to use blogger as a link blog. This site will remain the source of my longer musings while my new site, Ben Meadowcroft, Link Blog, will contain all the interesting links I’ve wanted to blog about but never had the time to manually add.
The most consistently popular section of my site is the CSS templates [zip file] that I provide, as such I have spent a bit of time on the templates and given them an overhaul. There is some nice use of semi-transparent backgrounds and user scalable font-sizing on show (using the browsers own controls!).
The CSS template is now licensed under a creative commons license specifically the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license. Only the templates (HTML, CSS and graphics) have been licensed under this creative commons license, the rest of the content of this site remains under my copyright. Note that for the attribution purposes of the license retaining a comment in the source code is sufficient attribution. If you distribute the graphics desperately then please attribute them appropriately.
If you have any comments on the templates, or wish to license them for commercial use, please contact me.
Blogging has become something of a lower priority for me at the moment, nevertheless I still intend to keep going with it, the biggest barrier to my success revolves around my having a bad case of the NIH syndrome, coupled with the need to satisfy a somewhat mammoth personal wish list when it comes to creating my own personal blogging software.
I could have settled with moveable type or similar, but I just can’t bring myself to do it. Professionally I have developed a number of content publishing sites, as well as a variety of highly complex “web apps“, so technical skill isn’t the problem. (I could use PHP, ASP, ASP.Net, JSP…) Unfortunately I am not under any time constraints when it comes to developing this site, I can work with my prototypes and Visio diagrams to my hearts content, always getting closer to that final result with every attempt. When I program professionally I always have deadlines and clients to satisfy, plus I get paid for it!
Anyway for anyone considering starting a blog, use something automated, there are plenty of tools out there. I don’t have any particular recommendations for blogging tools, doing it regularly by hand is time consuming, error prone and did I say time consuming? (and when you’ve left university to start a full-time job, gotten married, and started house hunting you’ll notice the lack of time a lot more than when you were a single student!).
Anyway I’m going to move this site over to one of my prototypes systems in the new year, honest, and develop it in an evolutionary process rather than the current feature creep prone waterfall model. Now if I could just add the atom api to it…
Some interesting links I’ve come a cross recently (via a variety of people’s sites I can’t remember, checkout my blog roll): Avoiding the Santa Claus approach to content management (A valuable wake up call for me), Examining differences between dynamic and batch publishing and finally the eXtremely Simple Database.
This is just a short pointer to an article written by James O. Coplien who happens to be a visiting professor at my old University. The article is entitled “Teaching OO: Putting the Object back into OOD“. Anyway the central premise of the article is that objects themselves should be viewed as the fundamental building block of object orientation rather than the class.
A short while ago I wrote an article about the web as an application suite. Jon Udell recently wrote an article about Interactive Microcontent, in this article he discusses working with fragments of a document. One of the examples he gives is of calendar data embedded into a document, his example has many similarities to an example I gave in my article. Clay Shirky’s semantic web essay andTim Bray’s semi-rebuttal of it has recently raised the profile of the semantic web topic again. I think that coming up with real and concrete applications for embedded meta data will help to provide the impetus the semantic web (in whatever form it takes) needs to become more than just an academic exercise.
I’ve been programming with Java for a few months in my new job now, my previous experience with C# helped me to pick it up quite quickly so there wasn’t too much of a learning curve for the stuff I’ve been working on. Now that I’ve entered the corporate world I recon I should start doing some corporate stuff like getting certified, so here’s my plan:
- Await delivery of Sun Certified Programmer & Developer for Java 2 Study Guide.
- E-mail a few people who I know have passed the certification and ask them for any tips.
- Study & read followed by some more studying & reading.
- Take the exam.
If any of you have any hints you want to pass on then get in touch.
This is just a quick update to let people know the site isn’t closed, I’m just really busy with my new job at the moment. Going into full time employment from a student lifestyle means you have a lot less free time available! One of the things I have been upto though is travelling to Utah from my brother-in-laws wedding, here are a couple of snaps from the trip.
I came across a set of notes written by Paul Hammond concerning the recent lecture given to the royal society by Tim Berners-Lee. One of the interesting point Paul brings up is the fact that despite living in a connected environment, the connections aren’t all that strong. Specifically most of the time the connection is the ubiquitous copy and paste scenario.
A goal of the semantic web is to provide both human readable documents as well as machine processable documents in the same package. For example it is quite easy for a human to recognise a date format (in one of the myriad ways it might be formatted), but for a computer to unambiguously recognise a date in a potential multitude of formats is more difficult. In his notes, Paul outlined what he did with an e-mail he received concerning the lecture:
When an e-mail came round the office about this evenings talk, the first thing I did was type the date into my calendar. I then looked up the address on a map site, and put a link into the appointment. I also added some quick notes about the subject of the talk. I then forwarded the info on to several friends who might be interested. They probably did the same thing. At every step, I had to manually cut and paste the information between applications, as did everyone else.
When I hear stories like this I am reminded of Microsofts attempts to introduce “Smart Tags”. Despite the obvious anti-microsoft feeling (which their track record may not have been unwarranted) smart tags have always seemed to me a good idea at some level. Replacing the smart tag concept with in document meta data provides a suitable platform for cross application communication. Imagine a suite of web enabled applications that were loosely coupled, now consider these applications registering an action for a specified metadata type, need an example of what the heck I’m talking about yet?
Imagine we start of with a small document fragment:
… lets meet up at around 10pm this tuesday …
Now using a sprinkling of automagic we get this fragment (the user of course only sees the original text):
… let’s meet up at around <date value=”2003-11-23 22:00:00″>10pm this tuesday</date> …
Using a bit of magic based on the date the message was written (another piece of meta data) and a few specified rules, the human readable date can be annotated with more machine processable information. By then taking the concept behind mime-types to a different level of granularity we can conceive of applications registering actions based on a specified metadata type. Given the previous sample a calendar application may associate an “add event on date” action with the date metadata. This action could then be exposed to the user in some manner (through a context menu for example).
Now for a bit of prior art:
Every one seems to be running CSS challenges these days. I launched mine a well over a year ago, Its a bit different from most of the others though and is designed to be a test of your table coding skills, If the truth be told I hadn’t thought much about it until I received an e-mail the other day (received in the process of relocation, hence the lack of updates to the site as my computer has been in a box). As with most e-mails It either praises my site or disses it, guess which one this comes under.
I was going to take up your challenge but then I looked at your example page in four different browsers, IE6, Moz1.4 Op7.2 and Firebird0.6 and it looks different in each. My question was going to be “Which version is the desired one” but the I thought better.
If you’re going to challenge table layouts then you should at least be sure that your page looks the same in the common browsers.
Not to mention that the content of the boxes on your example page spills out of its containing box when the window is narrowed.
You’re right, No one can make a table layout that misbehaves that way.
I challenge you to publish this e-mail.
Ephraim F. Moya
If you want a chance to win then get your entries in for the 27th of September. The prize is a valuable link in the sidebar on my front page (assuming it’s not a dodgy site), a couple of CD’s that I don’t listen to any more and any miscellaneous goodies I pull together at the last minute (a set of signed juggling balls perhaps, signed by me). I’ll ship it pretty much anywhere in the world so feel free to enter, if shipping costs get too much though the prize gets smaller! If you want to enter then create your design and send me a note letting me know where you’ve put it. If there are any problems then drop me a note and I’ll see what can be done. The winner will be announced on the 29th.
Oh yeah Ephraim, just one site for you to look at, KPMG
No one can make a table layout that misbehaves that way, but I can find plenty that misbehave in other ways.
Over on the Isolani site there is a good article discussing the accessibility problems of layout tables in HTML. As usual Iso takes quite a harsh line against the use of tables for layout, unlike many critics of table layouts however he clearly and concisely expresses the reasoning behind the points raised. While I agree with the opinions expressed in that article I should note that there are voices raised supporting the use of tables for both layouts and data.
So two dissenting opinions from people who champion accessible web design. Which side of the fence should I come down to as a web developer?
Well, the short answer is I believe in CSS for layouts and tables for data. However it should be noted that CSS is not always easy. Do not be fooled your standard templates might be ok but as you try to achieve more advanced effects you begin to run into browser incompatibilities. Does this mean we should give up on CSS and return to tables for layout? Some would say yes, I would say that when your up against a deadline and using a table to get a particular layout would take five minutes but could take a couple of hours to get right in CSS, you are tempted.
What does this teach? CSS can be hard. In my opinion if you want to be a professional in the web design game you have to learn some of the hard stuff now and again or you will sink into a pit of stagnant mediocrity. Learn it when your not under pressure, experiment and have a bit of passion about you chosen field.